Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11293642›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2001

Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. EUROASPIRE I and II Group. European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events.

EUROASPIRE I and II Group; European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 129 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01321255 phase3completedstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Improving Equitable Acces and Adherence to Secondary Prevention Therapy With a Fixed-Dose Combination Drug

Ran2012Enrolled2,118Registered outcomes6Posted comparisons0ConditionsMyocardial InfarctionArmsFDC, Separately drugs, simvastatin, aspirin and ramipril
Open the trial in the graph
NCT00462436 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2007, after this paper: background citation

Do Innovative Strategies Complement Medical Management to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk Factors Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2007 to 2010Enrolled35ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Type II Diabetes MellitusArmsConsumption of Dietary Portfolio
NCT02522182 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

ALLiance for sEcondary PREvention After an Episode of Acute Coronary Syndrome. The ALLEPRE Trial: a Fully Nurse-led Intensive Intervention Programme

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di ParmaRan2012 to 2025Enrolled2,060ConditionsAcute Coronary SyndromeArmsNurse-led Intensive Secondary Prevention Programme, Usual Treatment
NCT03483155 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Compliance With The European Society Of Cardiology Prevention Guidelines In Patients at High Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Assiut University

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAssiut UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled50ConditionsHypertension, Diabetes, Dyslipidemias
NCT04246008 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Neuromuscular Training on Functional Capacity in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorCardenal Herrera UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsAcute Coronary SyndromeArmsNeuromuscular training, Conventional strength training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The Enhancing Secondary Prevention in Coronary Artery Disease trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

EUROASPIRE I and II Group; European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are the top priority for preventive cardiology. The first EUROASPIRE survey among patients with established CHD in nine countries in 1995-96 showed substantial potential for risk reduction. A second survey (EUROASPIRE II) was done in 1999-2000 in the same countries to see whether preventive cardiology had improved since the first. We compared the proportion of patients in both studies who achieved the lifestyle, risk-factor, and therapeutic goals recommended by the Joint European Societies report on coronary prevention.

methodsThe surveys were undertaken in the same selected geographical areas and hospitals in the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Spain. Consecutive patients (men and women < or = 70 years of age) were identified after coronary-artery bypass graft or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or a hospital admission with acute myocardial infarction or ischaemia, and were interviewed at least 6 months later.

findings3569 and 3379 patients were interviewed in the first and second surveys, respectively. The prevalence of smoking remained almost unchanged at 19.4% vs 20.8%. The prevalence of obesity (body-mass index > or = 30 kg/m2) increased substantially from 25.3% to 32.8%. The proportion with high blood pressure (> or = 140/90 mm Hg) was virtually the same (55.4% vs 53.9%), whereas the prevalence of high total cholesterol concentrations (> or = 5.0 mmol/L) decreased substantially from 86.2% to 58.8%. Aspirin or other antiplatelet therapy was as widely used in the second survey as the first (83.9% overall), and reported use of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, and especially lipid-lowering drugs increased.

interpretationThe adverse lifestyle trends among European CHD patients are a cause for concern, as is the lack of any improvement in blood-pressure management, and the fact that most CHD patients are still not achieving the cholesterol goal of less than 5 mmol/L. There is a collective failure of medical practice in Europe to achieve the substantial potential among patients with CHD to reduce the risk of recurrent disease and death.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAnticoagulantsAntihypertensive AgentsCholesterolCoronary DiseaseDiabetes MellitusEuropeFemaleHealth SurveysHumansHypertensionHypolipidemic AgentsLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAnticoagulantsAntihypertensive AgentsCholesterolHypolipidemic AgentsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.