ArticleNucleic acids research2001
PartsList: a web-based system for dynamically ranking protein folds based on disparate attributes, including whole-genome expression and interaction information.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The four canonical tpr subunits of human APC/C form related homo-dimeric structures and stack in parallel to form a TPR suprahelix.Journal of molecular biology · 2013Article
- Wavelet-based functional clustering for patterns of high-dimensional dynamic gene expression.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2010Article
- Nothing about protein structure classification makes sense except in the light of evolution.Current opinion in structural biology · 2009Review
- A computational approach to the functional clustering of periodic gene-expression profiles.Genetics · 2008Article
- The Database of Macromolecular Motions: new features added at the decade mark.Nucleic acids research · 2006Article
- SPINE 2: a system for collaborative structural proteomics within a federated database framework.Nucleic acids research · 2003Article
- MolMovDB: analysis and visualization of conformational change and structural flexibility.Nucleic acids research · 2003Article
- Structural characterization of the human proteome.Genome research · 2002Article
- GeneCensus: genome comparisons in terms of metabolic pathway activity and protein family sharing.Nucleic acids research · 2002Article
- The dominance of the population by a selected few: power-law behaviour applies to a wide variety of genomic properties.Genome biology · 2002Article
- Comprehensive analysis of amino acid and nucleotide composition in eukaryotic genomes, comparing genes and pseudogenes.Nucleic acids research · 2002Article
- Integration of genomic datasets to predict protein complexes in yeast.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2002Article
- SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics.Nucleic acids research · 2002Article
- Evolutionary perspective on innate immune recognition.The Journal of cell biology · 2001Review
- Annotation transfer for genomics: measuring functional divergence in multi-domain proteins.Genome research · 2001Article
- SPINE: an integrated tracking database and data mining approach for identifying feasible targets in high-throughput structural proteomics.Nucleic acids research · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the number of protein folds is quite limited, a mode of analysis that will be increasingly common in the future, especially with the advent of structural genomics, is to survey and re-survey the finite parts list of folds from an expanding number of perspectives. We have developed a new resource, called PartsList, that lets one dynamically perform these comparative fold surveys. It is available on the web at http://bioinfo.mbb.yale.edu/partslist and http://www.partslist.org. The system is based on the existing fold classifications and functions as a form of companion annotation for them, providing 'global views' of many already completed fold surveys. The central idea in the system is that of comparison through ranking; PartsList will rank the approximately 420 folds based on more than 180 attributes. These include: (i) occurrence in a number of completely sequenced genomes (e.g. it will show the most common folds in the worm versus yeast); (ii) occurrence in the structure databank (e.g. most common folds in the PDB); (iii) both absolute and relative gene expression information (e.g. most changing folds in expression over the cell cycle); (iv) protein-protein interactions, based on experimental data in yeast and comprehensive PDB surveys (e.g. most interacting fold); (v) sensitivity to inserted transposons; (vi) the number of functions associated with the fold (e.g. most multi-functional folds); (vii) amino acid composition (e.g. most Cys-rich folds); (viii) protein motions (e.g. most mobile folds); and (ix) the level of similarity based on a comprehensive set of structural alignments (e.g. most structurally variable folds). The integration of whole-genome expression and protein-protein interaction data with structural information is a particularly novel feature of our system. We provide three ways of visualizing the rankings: a profiler emphasizing the progression of high and low ranks across many pre-selected attributes, a dynamic comparer for custom comparisons and a numerical rankings correlator. These allow one to directly compare very different attributes of a fold (e.g. expression level, genome occurrence and maximum motion) in the uniform numerical format of ranks. This uniform framework, in turn, highlights the way that the frequency of many of the attributes falls off with approximate power-law behavior (i.e. according to V(-b), for attribute value V and constant exponent b), with a few folds having large values and most having small values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.