Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11289661›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2000

A simplified model for predicting malaria entomologic inoculation rates based on entomologic and parasitologic parameters relevant to control.

G F Killeen, F E McKenzie, B D Foy, C Schieffelin, P F Billingsley, J C Beier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Complex non-Research square · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. IdentifyingeLife · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A New Test of a Theory about Old Mosquitoes.Trends in parasitology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

G F KilleenDepartment of Tropical Medicine, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Center for Infectious Diseases, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112-2824, USA.
F E McKenzie
B D Foy
C Schieffelin
P F Billingsley
J C Beier

Funding

Vector competence of African malaria vectorsU19AI045511 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BEIER, JOHN C. C. · 1999 to 2004
$3.4M
Toxoplasma Surface Antigens and ImmunityZ01AI001017 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI GRIGG, MICHAEL · 2007 to 2008
$801k
ANOPHELES VECTOR POTENTIAL FOR MALARIA TRANSMISSIONR01AI029000 · NIAID · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI BEIER, JOHN C. C. · 1990 to 1997
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AI001017Intramural NIH HHS Z99 TW999999NIAID NIH HHS F32-AI-1017-02NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI-29000NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI045511NIAID NIH HHS U19-AI-45511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria transmission intensity is modeled from the starting perspective of individual vector mosquitoes and is expressed directly as the entomologic inoculation rate (EIR). The potential of individual mosquitoes to transmit malaria during their lifetime is presented graphically as a function of their feeding cycle length and survival, human biting preferences, and the parasite sporogonic incubation period. The EIR is then calculated as the product of 1) the potential of individual vectors to transmit malaria during their lifetime, 2) vector emergence rate relative to human population size, and 3) the infectiousness of the human population to vectors. Thus, impacts on more than one of these parameters will amplify each other's effects. The EIRs transmitted by the dominant vector species at four malaria-endemic sites from Papua New Guinea, Tanzania, and Nigeria were predicted using field measurements of these characteristics together with human biting rate and human reservoir infectiousness. This model predicted EIRs (+/- SD) that are 1.13 +/- 0.37 (range = 0.84-1.59) times those measured in the field. For these four sites, mosquito emergence rate and lifetime transmission potential were more important determinants of the EIR than human reservoir infectiousness. This model and the input parameters from the four sites allow the potential impacts of various control measures on malaria transmission intensity to be tested under a range of endemic conditions. The model has potential applications for the development and implementation of transmission control measures and for public health education.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAnophelesEndemic DiseasesEntomologyFeeding BehaviorHumansInsect Bites and StingsInsect VectorsMalaria, FalciparumNigeriaPapua New GuineaPlasmodium falciparumTanzania

Identifiers

PMID11289661
PMCPMC2483339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.