Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11287657›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2001

Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach.

P Beerli, J Felsenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 459 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
459citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

459 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gene tree patterns help answer: vicariance or dispersal?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. CoalMiner: a coalescent model generator forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Coats of Variable Hue in Tunisian Hares (GenusAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Population Genetics of an Endemic SpeciesEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

399 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P BeerliDepartment of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7360, USA. beerli@genetics.washington.edu
J Felsenstein

Funding

Selection and Association in Coalescent GenealogiesR01GM051929 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KUHNER, MARY K · 1995 to 2006
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM 01989NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM051929NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM 51929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A maximum likelihood estimator based on the coalescent for unequal migration rates and different subpopulation sizes is developed. The method uses a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach to investigate possible genealogies with branch lengths and with migration events. Properties of the new method are shown by using simulated data from a four-population n-island model and a source-sink population model. Our estimation method as coded in migrate is tested against genetree; both programs deliver a very similar likelihood surface. The algorithm converges to the estimates fairly quickly, even when the Markov chain is started from unfavorable parameters. The method was used to estimate gene flow in the Nile valley by using mtDNA data from three human populations.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationPopulation DensityTransients and MigrantsHumansLikelihood FunctionsMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo Method

Identifiers

PMID11287657
PMCPMC31874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.