ArticleJournal of virology2001
AIDS vaccination studies using an ex vivo feline immunodeficiency virus model: reevaluation of neutralizing antibody levels elicited by a protective and a nonprotective vaccine after removal of antisubstrate cell antibodies.
Article in Journal of virology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Role of Env in resistance of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV)-infected cats to superinfection by a second FIV strain as determined by using a chimeric virus.Journal of virology · 2007Article
- Article
- Vaccination with an inactivated virulent feline immunodeficiency virus engineered to express high levels of Env.Journal of virology · 2005Article
- FIV vaccine development and its importance to veterinary and human medicine: a review FIV vaccine 2002 update and review.Veterinary immunology and immunopathology · 2002Review
- AIDS vaccination studies using an ex vivo feline immunodeficiency virus model: failure to protect and possible enhancement of challenge infection by four cell-based vaccines prepared with autologous lymphoblasts.Journal of virology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the feline immunodeficiency virus system, immunization with a fixed-infected-cell vaccine conferred protection against virulent homologous challenge but the immune effectors involved remained elusive. In particular, few or no neutralizing antibodies were detected in sera from vaccinated cats. Here we show that, when preadsorbed with selected feline cells, the same sera revealed clearly evident virus-neutralizing activity. Because high titers of neutralizing antibody in cell-adsorbed sera from 23 cats immunized with fixed-infected-cell or whole-inactivated-virus vaccines correlated with protection, it is likely that they were more important for protection than formerly realized. In vitro, the fixed-cell vaccine efficiently removed neutralizing antibody from immune sera while the whole-inactivated-virus vaccine was much less effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.