Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11286656›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2001

Impact of New Sexually Transmitted Disease Diagnostics on Clinical Practice and Public Health Policy.

Jeanne M. Marrazzo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeanne M. MarrazzoHarborview Medical Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, 325 9th Avenue, Mailstop #359931, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. jmm2@u.washington.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) offer enhanced sensitivity and excellent specificity for many sexually transmitted diseases. For some pathogens for which a practical diagnostic test does not exist, such as human papillomavirus (HPV), NAAT are also useful. Further, most NAAT can be applied to less "invasive" patient specimens, including urine and vaginal fluid. This dramatically increases opportunities to test persons outside of traditional clinic settings. Use of NAAT has resulted in revisions of the proportion of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) that are asymptomatic, and has increased measured prevalence of some STDs, notably Chlamydia trachomatis. NAAT have helped to clarify the eitiologies of genital ulcer disease and urethritis, and have provided a more complete picture of the natural history of genital herpes and HPV. The ability of polymerase chain reaction to detect HPV may change the management of patients who have abnormal Pap smears. Efforts to bear the relatively high cost of NAAT, such as pooling urine, are under study. NAAT for bacterial STD should be in populations at high risk for asymptomatic STD, especially those who might not access routine STD screening at traditional settings. Working through the cost to health care systems, including the public health arena, and implementation at the laboratory level are challenges to overcome before NAAT become the standard of care in most settings.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.