Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11286642›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2001

The genetics of venous and arterial thromboembolism.

D Lillicrap

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

D LillicrapDepartment of Pathology, Queen's University, 99 University Avenue, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada. lillicrap@cliff.path.queensu.ca
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is substantial evidence to indicate that the pathologic processes of venous and arterial thromboembolism involve both genetic and environmental influences. Scientific progress over the past decade has revealed a growing number of genetic factors, such as factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene variant, that are present in more than 1% of the population and increase the relative risk of venous thrombosis between two- and sevenfold. Furthermore, several of these factors have been demonstrated to interact adversely with environmental influences, such as oral contraceptives and smoking. Although these traits are present at relatively high prevalence in the population, the magnitude of the increased thrombotic risk associated with these factors is substantially less than that related to inherited deficiency of the natural anticoagulant protein antithrombin, and somewhat less than the elevated risk with protein C and protein S deficiencies. In contrast to the progress that has been made in understanding the genetic contributions to venous thromboembolism, much still remains to be learned about the genetic basis of arterial thrombosis. Despite the documentation of associations between several genetic polymorphisms with plasma procoagulant levels, consistent associations with arterial thrombotic disease have not been found.

Indexed as

Arterial Occlusive DiseasesHumansThromboembolismVenous Thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID11286642
OpenAlexW2033472275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.