ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2001
Gene-diet interaction and plasma lipid response to dietary intervention.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of Preoperative Very Low-Calorie Diets in Preparation for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2026Review
- Shared genetic etiology between Parkinson's disease and blood levels of specific lipids.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2021Article
- Methodology for studying postprandial lipid metabolism.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2007Review
- Loss of apolipoprotein E exacerbates the neonatal lethality of the Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome mouse.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2007Article
- Genetics and public health--evolution, or revolution?Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2004Review
- Pharmacogenetics of Lipid-lowering Therapies.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2002Review
- Race-ethnic differences in the associations of maternal lipid trait genetic risk scores with longitudinal fetal growth.Journal of clinical lipidologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research in the field of gene-diet interactions as determinants of plasma lipid response to dietary interventions has accumulated a substantial body of evidence during the past decade. Several candidate genes have shown some promise as potential markers of individual dietary responsiveness. Among the best characterized are the APOE, APOA4, APOB, APOC3, and LPL loci. Other genes are being continuously incorporated to this most interesting search. However, in very few cases has consensus been achieved about the usefulness of genetic markers as clinically significant predictors of dietary response. The increased ability to generate genotypic information, in combination with the knowledge from the human genome project and more comprehensive experimental designs, will dramatically improve our capacity to answer many of our current questions. It will also help to prove that knowledge of an individual's genetic background will facilitate more precise dietary counseling and intervention, and more efficacious primary and secondary coronary heart disease prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11286641What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.