Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11286325›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2001

Bioadhesion: new possibilities for drug administration?

J Woodley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Micro and nanoscale technologies in oral drug delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J WoodleyLaboratoire Cinétique des Xénobiotiques, Faculty of Pharmacy, Toulouse, France. woodley@cict.fr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioadhesion (and mucoadhesion) is the process whereby synthetic and natural macromolecules adhere to mucosal surfaces in the body. If these materials are then incorporated into pharmaceutical formulations, drug absorption by mucosal cells may be enhanced or the drug released at the site for an extended period of time. For synthetic polymers, such as the chitosans, carbopols and carbomers, the mechanism of bio/mucoadhesion is the result of a number of different physicochemical interactions. Biological bio/mucoadhesives, such as plant lectins, show specific interactions with cell surfaces and mucin and are seen as the 'second generation' bioadhesives. Bioadhesive systems for drug administration via the buccal and nasal cavities are nearing the market; in the case of nasal bioadhesion, bioadhesive microparticles are used. A bioadhesive formulation for drug administration to the vagina is in use. The gastrointestinal tract is proving a more difficult site because of the rapid turnover of mucus, and relatively constant transit time, but intensive research is in progress. Micro- and nano-particles, coated with either bio/mucoadhesive polymers or specific biological bioadhesives, are showing some promise, but will require considerable research and development before reaching the market.

Indexed as

AdhesivesAdministration, BuccalAdministration, IntranasalAdministration, IntravaginalBiological AvailabilityDigestive SystemDrug Delivery SystemsHumansMucous MembraneOphthalmic SolutionsPharmaceutical PreparationsAdhesivesOphthalmic SolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.