Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11285293›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2001

The de-adhesive activity of matricellular proteins: is intermediate cell adhesion an adaptive state?

J E Murphy-Ullrich

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 471 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Regulatory Mechanisms of SPARC Overexpression in Melanoma Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Viscoelasticity, Like Forces, Plays a Role in Mechanotransduction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J E Murphy-UllrichDepartment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, G038 Volker Hall, 1670 University Boulevard, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0019, USA. murphy@path.uab.edu
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

THROMBOSPONDIN AND TENASCIN--CELL ADHESION REGULATORSR01HL044575 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MURPHY-ULLRICH, JOANNE E · 1990 to 2000
$177k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-44575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of cellular de-adhesion is potentially important for the ability of a cell to participate in morphogenesis and to respond to injurious stimuli. Cellular de-adhesion is induced by the highly regulated matricellular proteins TSP1 and 2, tenascin-C, and SPARC. These proteins induce a rapid transition to an intermediate state of adhesiveness characterized by loss of actin-containing stress fibers and restructuring of the focal adhesion plaque that includes loss of vinculin and alpha-actinin, but not of talin or integrin. This process involves intracellular signaling mediators, which are engaged in response to matrix protein-receptor interactions. Each of these proteins employs different receptors and signaling pathways to achieve this common morphologic endpoint. What is the function of this intermediate adhesive state and what is the physiologic significance of this action of the matricellular proteins? Given that matricellular proteins are expressed in response to injury and during development, one can speculate that the intermediate adhesive state is an adaptive condition that facilitates expression of specific genes that are involved in repair and adaptation. Since cell shape is maintained in weakly adherent cells, this state might induce survival signals to prevent apoptosis due to loss of strong cell adhesion, but yet allow for cell locomotion. The three matricellular proteins considered here might each preferentially facilitate one or more aspects of this adaptive response rather than all of these equally. Currently, we have only preliminary data to support the specific ideas proposed in this article. It will be interesting in the next several years to continue to elucidate the biological roles of the intermediate adhesive state induced by these matricellular proteins. and focal adhesions in a cell that nevertheless maintains a spread, extended morphology and integrin clustering. TSP1, tenascin-C, and SPARC induce the intermediate adhesive state, as shown by the red arrows. The significance of each adhesive state for cell behavior is indicated beneath the cells. The weak adhesive state would be consistent with cells undergoing apoptosis during remodeling or those undergoing cytokinesis. The strong adhesive state is characteristic of a differentiated, quiescent cell, whereas cells in the intermediate adhesive state would include those involved in responding to injury during wound healing or in tissue remodeling during morphogenesis.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAnnexin A2Binding SitesCalcium-Binding ProteinsCalreticulinCell AdhesionExtracellular Matrix ProteinsGlycoproteinsHumansOsteonectinRibonucleoproteinsSignal TransductionTenascinThrombospondin 1Thrombospondin 2Annexin A2Calcium-Binding ProteinsCalreticulinExtracellular Matrix ProteinsGlycoproteinsOsteonectinRibonucleoproteinsTenascinThrombospondin 1Thrombospondin 2Thrombospondins

Identifiers

PMID11285293
PMCPMC199582
OpenAlexW1978310574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.