Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11284729›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal2001

Differences in tissue-specific and embryonic expression of mouse Ceacam1 and Ceacam2 genes.

E Han, D Phan, P Lo, M N Poy, R Behringer, S M Najjar, S H Lin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

E HanDepartment of Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
D Phan
P Lo
M N Poy
R Behringer
S M Najjar
S H Lin
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kathrin Milbury · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
SUBSTRATES AND INSULIN RECEPTOR ENDOCYTOSISR01DK054254 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI NAJJAR, SONIA M. · 2000 to 2021
$5.8M
INSULIN RECEPTOR SUBSTRATES AND LIPOGENESISR21DK057497 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI NAJJAR, SONIA MICHAEL · 1999 to 2000
$101k
NCI NIH HHS CA 16672NIDDK NIH HHS DK 54254NIDDK NIH HHS DK 57497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intercellular adhesion molecule CEACAM1, also known as C-CAM1 (where CAM is cell-adhesion molecule), can function as a tumour suppressor in several carcinomas, including those of the prostate, breast, bladder and colon. This suggests that CEACAM1 may play an important role in the regulation of normal cell growth and differentiation. However, there is no direct evidence to support this putative function of CEACAM1. To elucidate its physiological function by targeted gene deletion, we isolated the Ceacam genes from a mouse 129 Sv/Ev library. Although there is only one Ceacam1 gene in humans and one in rats, two homologous genes (Ceacam1 and Ceacam2) have been identified in the mouse. Our sequence analysis revealed that the genes encoded nine exons and spanned approx. 16-17 kb (Ceacam1) and 25 kb (Ceacam2). The genes were highly similar (79.6%). The major differences in the protein-coding regions were located in exons 2, 5 and 6 (76.9%, 87.0% and 78.5% similarity respectively). In addition, introns 2, 5 and 7 were also significantly different, being 29.7%, 59.8% and 64.5% similar respectively. While most of these differences were due to nucleotide substitutions, two insertions of 418 and 5849 bp occurred in intron 2 of Ceacam2, and another two insertions of 1384 and 197 bp occurred in introns 5 and 7 respectively. To determine whether functional redundancy exists between Ceacam1 and Ceacam2, we examined their expression in 16 mouse tissues by using semi-quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. As in human and rat, in the mouse Ceacam1 mRNA was highly abundant in the liver, small intestine, prostate and spleen. In contrast, Ceacam2 mRNA was only detected in kidney, testis and, to a lesser extent, spleen. Reverse transcription-PCR using testis RNA indicated that Ceacam2 in the testis is an alternatively spliced form containing only exons 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 and 9. In the mouse embryo, Ceacam1 mRNA was detected at day 8.5, disappeared between days 9.5 and 12.5, and re-appeared at day 19. On the other hand, no Ceacam2 mRNA was detected throughout embryonic development. The different tissue expression patterns and regulation during embryonic development suggest that the CEACAM1 and CEACAM2 proteins, although highly similar, may have different functions both during mouse development and in adulthood.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, DifferentiationBase SequenceCarcinoembryonic AntigenCell Adhesion MoleculesDNA, ComplementaryEmbryonic and Fetal DevelopmentGlycoproteinsMaleMiceMolecular Sequence DataSequence Homology, Amino AcidTestisAdenosine TriphosphatasesAntigens, CDAntigens, DifferentiationCarcinoembryonic AntigenCD66 antigensCeacam1 protein, mouseCeacam2 protein, mouseCell Adhesion MoleculesDNA, ComplementaryGlycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID11284729
PMCPMC1221753
OpenAlexW2002160291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.