Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11283058›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001

Chlamydial serology: comparative diagnostic value of immunoblotting, microimmunofluorescence test, and immunoassays using different recombinant proteins as antigens.

S Bas, P Muzzin, B Ninet, J E Bornand, C Scieux, T L Vischer

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The serodiagnositic value ofFrontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparison of five commercial serological tests for the detection of anti-Chlamydia trachomatis antibodies.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Chlamydial infection: the link with ocular adnexal lymphomas.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S BasDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. bas-sylvette@diogenes.hcuge.ch
P Muzzin
B Ninet
J E Bornand
C Scieux
T L Vischer
Center for Rheumatology · USOffice of Infectious Diseases · USSaint Louis University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve the reliability of the serodiagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections, an immunoblot analysis, a microimmunofluorescence titration, and different immunoassays using synthetic peptides derived from species-specific epitopes in variable domain IV of the major outer membrane protein or recombinant antigens (heat shock protein 70 [hsp70], hsp60, hsp10, polypeptide encoded by open reading frame 3 of the plasmid [pgp3], macrophage infectivity potentiator, and a fragment of the total lipopolysaccharide) were evaluated. Because cross-reactions between chlamydial species have been reported, the microimmunofluorescence tests were also performed with Chlamydia pneumoniae and Chlamydia psittaci used as antigens, and C. pneumoniae-specific antibodies were also determined by immunoassays. Since the presence of antimicrobial antibodies must be interpreted in light of their prevalence in the general population, responses obtained with serum samples from patients with well-defined infection (i.e., with positive urethral or endocervical C. trachomatis DNA amplification) were compared to those obtained with samples from healthy blood donors. The best sensitivity (86%) with a specificity of 81% was obtained for immunoblotting results, when the number of individuals with > or =10 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and/or > or =2 IgM responses to the different C. trachomatis antigens was considered. A 13-kDa antigen was recognized by most of the samples (86% for IgG) from patients with acute urogenital infection but rarely (3%) by those from healthy blood donors (P < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity results obtained for serum antibodies to peptides or recombinant antigens were slightly lower than those results obtained for the number of responses to whole C. trachomatis antigens, which were 76 and 77%, respectively, when IgG responses to both recombinant hsp60 and pgp3 were considered.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunoassayImmunoblottingMiddle AgedPeptidesRecombinant ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialPeptidesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11283058
PMCPMC87941
OpenAlexW2145336347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.