Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11283057›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001

Comparison of the E-test with the NCCLS M38-P method for antifungal susceptibility testing of common and emerging pathogenic filamentous fungi.

A Espinel-Ingroff

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 5-(1Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. A 9-Year Experience ofInfection and drug resistance · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Novel Hit Compounds as Putative Antifungals: The Case ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oil ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  15. Antifungal activity of Gallesia integrifolia fruit essential oil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Species Identification andAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

A Espinel-IngroffDivision of Infectious Diseases, Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0049.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) M38-P method describes standard parameters for testing the fungistatic antifungal activities (MICs) of established agents against filamentous fungi (molds). The present study evaluated the in vitro fungistatic activities of itraconazole and amphotericin B by the E-test and the NCCLS M38-P microdilution method against 186 common and emerging pathogenic molds (123 isolates of Aspergillus spp. [five species], 16 isolates of Fusarium spp. [two species], 4 Paecilomyces lilacinus isolates, 5 Rhizopus arrhizus isolates, 15 Scedosporium spp., 18 dematiaceous fungi, and 5 Trichoderma longibrachiatum isolates). The agreement between the methods for amphotericin B MICs ranged from 70% for Fusarium solani to > or =90% for most of the other species after the first reading; agreement was dependent on both the incubation time and the species being evaluated. Major discrepancies between the amphotericin B MICs determined by the E-test and the NCCLS M38-P method were demonstrated for three of the five species of Aspergillus tested and the two species of Fusarium tested. This discrepancy was more marked after 48 h of incubation; the geometric mean MICs determined by the E-test increased between 24 and 48 h from between 1.39 and 3.3 microg/ml to between 5.2 and >8 microg/ml for Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Aspergillus nidulans. The agreement between the itraconazole MICs determined by the E-test and the NCCLS M38-P method ranged from 83.3% for A. nidulans to > or =90% for all the other species tested; the overall agreement was higher (92.7%) than that for amphotericin B (87.9%). The agreement was less dependent on the incubation time. Clinical trials need to be conducted to establish the role of the results of either the E-test or the NCCLS M38-P method in vitro for molds with the two agents as predictors of clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCulture MediaFungiHumansItraconazoleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycosesPilot ProjectsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCulture MediaItraconazole

Identifiers

PMID11283057
PMCPMC87940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.