ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001
Evaluation of Etest for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation of in vitro itraconazole and fluconazole susceptibility with clinical outcome for patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis.Mycopathologia · 2004Trial
- Rapid antifungal susceptibility testing from positive blood cultures using direct gradient diffusion: a prospective study.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Observational
- Direct Identification of Yeasts from Blood Cultures and Body Fluids Using MALDI-TOF MS with Concurrent Antifungal Susceptibility Testing.Mycopathologia · 2025Article
- Role of microplastics in the survival and antimicrobial susceptibility ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Analysis of Antifungal Drug Resistance AmongInfection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Methods for screening and evaluation of antimicrobial activity: A review of protocols, advantages, and limitations.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2024Review
- Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing for the Rapid Detection of Fluconazole Resistance inAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2021Article
- Direct Fluconazole Disk Susceptibility Testing for Candida glabrata-Positive Blood Cultures.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Article
- Epidemiological Trends of Fungemia in Greece with a Focus on Candidemia during the Recent Financial Crisis: a 10-Year Survey in a Tertiary Care Academic Hospital and Review of Literature.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Review
- Antifungal Susceptibly Testing by Concentration Gradient Strip Etest Method for Fungal Isolates: A Review.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Evaluation of direct antifungal susceptibility testing methods of Candida spp. from positive blood culture bottles.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2018Article
- The Etest Performed Directly on Blood Culture Bottles Is a Reliable Tool for Detection of Fluconazole-Resistant Candida albicans Isolates.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017Article
- Agreement of Direct Antifungal Susceptibility Testing from Positive Blood Culture Bottles with the Conventional Method for Candida Species.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Evaluation of antifungal susceptibility testing with microdilution and Etest methods of Candida blood isolates.Mycopathologia · 2011Article
- In vitro cytotoxicity of two novel oral formulations of Amphotericin B (iCo-009 and iCo-010) against Candida albicans, human monocytic and kidney cell lines.Lipids in health and disease · 2011Article
- Rapid antifungal susceptibility determination for yeast isolates by use of Etest performed directly on blood samples from patients with fungemia.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
- Multidrug-resistant Trichosporon asahii infection of nongranulocytopenic patients in three intensive care units.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The performance of the Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures was compared with that of the macrodilution method for determining the MICs of five antifungal agents. Culture broths with blood from bottles positive for yeasts were inoculated directly onto plates for susceptibility testing with the Etest, and the MICs were read after 24 and 48 h of incubation. A total of 141 positive blood cultures (72 cultures of Candida albicans, 31 of Candida tropicalis, 14 of Candida glabrata, 11 of Candida parapsilosis, 3 of Candida krusei, and 3 of Cryptococcus neoformans, 4 miscellaneous yeast species, and 3 mixed cultures) were tested, and the rates of MIC agreement (+/-1 log(2) dilution) between the direct Etest (at 24 and 48 h, respectively) and macrodilution methods were as follows: amphotericin B, 81.8 and 93.5%; flucytosine, 84.8 and 87.7%; fluconazole, 89.4 and 85.5%; itraconazole, 69.7 and 63.8%; ketoconazole, 87.9 and 79.0%. By a large-sample t test, the difference in log(2) dilution between the direct Etest and the macrodilution method was found to be small (P < 0.05). The lone exceptions were ketoconazole at 48 h of incubation and itraconazole at both 24 and 48 h of incubation (P > 0.05). By Tukey's multiple comparisons, the difference between the direct Etest (48 h) and reference methods among different species was found to be less than 1 log(2) dilution. When the MICs were translated into interpretive susceptibility, the minor errors caused by the direct Etest (at 24 and 48 h, respectively) were as follows: flucytosine, 2.3 and 1.4%; fluconazole, 3.0 and 3.6%; itraconazole, 21.2 and 21.3%. Itraconazole also produced an additional 3.0 and 3.6% major errors as determined by the direct Etest at 24 and 48 h, respectively. It was concluded that, except for itraconazole, the Etest method was feasible for direct susceptibility testing of blood cultures positive for yeasts. The method is simple, and the results could be read between 24 and 48 h after direct inoculation, whenever the inhibition zones were discernible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.