Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11282861›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001

Medically unexplained symptoms in frequent attenders of secondary health care: retrospective cohort study.

S Reid, S Wessely, T Crayford, M Hotopf

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Non-Cardiac Chest Pain as a Persistent Physical Symptom: Psychological Distress and Workability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Contribution of objectively measured grating acuity by sweep visually evoked potentials to the diagnosis of unexplained visual loss.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S ReidAcademic Department of Psychological Medicine, Guy's, King's College, and St Thomas's Hospital School of Medicine and Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AZ, UK. steve.reid@kcl.ac.uk
S Wessely
T Crayford
M Hotopf

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of medically unexplained symptoms in patients who most frequently attend outpatient services.

designRetrospective cohort study over three years with review of case notes.

settingSecondary care services in the South Thames (West) NHS region.

participantsOutpatient attenders with new appointments in 1993.

main outcome measuresNumber of outpatient appointments, and number of consultation episodes for medically unexplained conditions.

resultsMedical records of 361 of 400 sampled frequent attenders were examined, and 971 consultation episodes were recorded. Ninety seven (27%) had one or more consultation episodes in which the condition was medically unexplained; 208 (21%) of the 971 consultation episodes were medically unexplained. Abdominal pain, chest pain, headache, and back pain were commonly found to be medically unexplained.

conclusionsMedically unexplained symptoms present in most hospital specialties and account for a considerable proportion of consultations by frequent attenders in secondary care.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainAdultAgedBack PainChest PainCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHeadacheHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective StudiesSomatoform Disorders

Identifiers

PMID11282861
PMCPMC30552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.