Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11281937›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2000

Reassurance through surveillance in the face of clinical uncertainty: the experience of women at risk of familial breast cancer.

Evelyn P. Parsons, Valerie Beale, Helen Bennett, Jo Jones, Emma J Lycett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Editorial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2000
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evelyn P. ParsonsSenior Lecturer and Senior Research Fellow in Medical Genetics, School of Nursing Studies, UWCM, Cardiff, UK; School of Nursing Studies, UWCM, Cardiff, UK; Research Officer, School of Nursing Studies, UWCM, Cardiff, UK.
Valerie Beale
Helen Bennett
Jo Jones
Emma J Lycett
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the main issues raised by clinicians when they are counselling women at risk of breast cancer and explore the response of a group of women 1 year after counselling.

designA qualitative study which involved the thematic analysis of a series of transcripts from clinical consultations, semi-structured interviews and focus groups.

participantsFirst, a series of clinical consultations (n=153), involving seven clinicians, were randomly selected during a Medical Research Council funded study of genetic assessment (TRACE). Second, a group of women (n=43), involved in the TRACE study, were interviewed, or joined a focus group, 1 year after their genetic assessment.

conclusionsThere was evidence that, although the clinical consultations were embedded with multiple messages of uncertainty, the women's accounts did not reflect this. The women talked about the reassurance they had found because they had met with an expert and become members of the surveillance society. The authors highlight the tension that exists because of the difference between lay expectations about on-going surveillance and the realities of collective service provision.

Identifiers

PMID11281937
PMCPMC5060111
OpenAlexW2016419123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.