ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy1999
Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting values.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Moving Forward With Telehealth in Cancer Rehabilitation: Patient Perspectives From a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR cancer · 2023Article
- "It is not a scientific number it is just a feeling": Populating a multi-dimensional end-of-life decision framework using deliberative methods.Health economics · 2021Article
- A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Assessing societal and offender perspectives on the value of offender healthcare: a stated preference research protocol.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2017Article
- Prioritising patients for bariatric surgery: building public preferences from a discrete choice experiment into public policy.BMJ open · 2015Article
- Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Article
- The public's priorities in health services.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Article
- Article
- Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries.International journal of health policy and management · 2014Article
- Priority setting for the implementation of artemisinin-based combination therapy policy in Tanzania: evaluation against the accountability for reasonableness framework.Implementation science : IS · 2012Article
- Impact of a hospital improvement initiative in Bangladesh on patient experiences and satisfaction with services: two cross-sectional studies.BMC health services research · 2011Article
- Israeli lay persons' views on priority-setting criteria for Alzheimer's disease.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2009Article
- What should be given a priority - costly medications for relatively few people or inexpensive ones for many? The Health Parliament public consultation initiative in Israel.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2008Article
- A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2008Review
- Public views on priority setting for high cost medications in public hospitals in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2007Article
- What did the public think of health services reform in Bangladesh? Three national community-based surveys 1999-2003.Health research policy and systems · 2007Article
- Patients' priorities concerning health research: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2005Article
- Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is increasing interest, in the UK and elsewhere, in involving the public in health care priority setting. At the same time, however, there is evidence of lack of clarity about the objectives of some priority setting projects and also about the role of public involvement. Further, some projects display an apparent ignorance of both long-standing theoretical literature and practical experience of methodologies for eliciting values in health care and related fields. After a brief examination of the context of health care priority setting and public involvement, this paper describes a range of different approaches to eliciting values. These approaches are critically examined on a number of dimensions including the type of choice allowed to respondents and the implications of aggregation of values across individuals. Factors which affect the appropriateness of the different techniques to specific applications are discussed. A check-list of questions to be asked when selecting techniques is presented.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.