Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11281859›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy1998

Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Carol A. Sawka, Vivek Goel, Catherine A. Mahut, Glen A. Taylor, Elaine C. Thiel, Annette M. O'Connor, Ida Ackerman, Janet H. Burt, Elaine H. Gort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preoperative patient education for breast reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of information in decision aids.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2007
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A systematic development process for patient decision aids.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Development and pilot-testing of a Decision Aid for use among Chinese women facing breast cancer surgery.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
    Article
  14. Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010
    Article
  15. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2009
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Preliminary testing of a just-in-time, user-defined values clarification exercise to aid lower literate women in making informed breast cancer treatment decisions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2006
    Article
  18. Decision aids in routine practice: lessons from the breast cancer initiative.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2006
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carol A. SawkaDivisions of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Divisions of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Divisions of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science in Ontario, Toronto, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa; York County Hospital, Newmarket, Canada.
Vivek Goel
Catherine A. Mahut
Glen A. Taylor
Elaine C. Thiel
Annette M. O'Connor
Ida Ackerman
Janet H. Burt
Elaine H. Gort

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA patient decision aid for the surgical treatment of early stage breast cancer was developed and evaluated. The rationale for its development was the knowledge that breast conserving therapy (lumpectomy followed by breast radiation) and mastectomy produce equivalent outcomes, and the current general agreement that the decision for the type of surgery should rest with the patient.

methodsA decision aid was developed and evaluated in sequential pilot studies of 18 and 10 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer who were facing a decision for breast conserving therapy or mastectomy. Both qualitative (general reaction, self-reported anxiety, clarity, satisfaction) and quantitative (knowledge and decisional conflict) measures were assessed.

resultsThe decision aid consists of an audiotape and workbook and takes 36 min to complete. Based on qualitative comments and satisfaction ratings, 17 of 18 women reported a positive reaction to the decision aid, and all 18 reported that it helped clarify information given by the surgeon. Women did not report an increase in anxiety and 17 of 18 women were either satisfied or very satisfied with the decision aid.

conclusionThis pilot study supports the hypothesis that this decision aid may be a helpful adjunct in the decision for surgical management of early stage breast cancer. We are currently conducting a randomized trial of the decision aid versus a simple educational pamphlet to evaluate its efficacy as measured by knowledge, decisional conflict, anxiety and post-decisional regret.

Identifiers

PMID11281859
PMCPMC5081065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.