ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy1998
Expectations of health care: promoted, managed or shared?
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A qualitative study of nurse-patient communication and information provision during surgical pre-admission clinics.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Lifetimes of the clinical consultation: the current situation of healthcare consultations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Article
- Understanding the nature of health: New perspectives for medicine and public health. Improved wellbeing at lower costs.F1000Research · 2016Article
- After the end of free fall: geriatricizing primary care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2008Article
- Time for a change.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2007Article
- [Uncertainty in family medicine and decision-taking shared with the patient].Atencion primaria · 2006Article
- [Patients' voice: improving understanding between doctors and patients].Atencion primaria · 2004Article
- Hart of Glyncorrwg.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2004Article
- After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.Quality & safety in health care · 2002Article
- Evolving general practice consultation in Britain: issues of length and context.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Review
- After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Volume, costs and content of medical care depend on professional and public expectations. The UK National Health Service (NHS) removed price barriers to access, so depressed expectations became an important factor in cost control. In USA, professional control of care business inflated expectations and costs. Managed care in the NHS failed to rationalize care because managers seem even less trustworthy than clinicians as arbiters of rational expectations in contexts of underfunding. Rational expectations depend on restored trust, mutual and managerial respect for expertise of both clinicians and patients, and transcendence of the provider-consumer model for value production in medical care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.