Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11279786›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001

Magnesium sulphate versus lytic cocktail for eclampsia.

L Duley, A M Gulmezoglu

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  3. Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  4. Magnesium sulphate versus phenytoin for eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  5. Magnesium sulphate versus lytic cocktail for eclampsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2009
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Use of Antihypertensive Drugs During Preeclampsia.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Epidemiology of Maternal Mortality in Malawi.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2006
    Article
  19. Continuing medical education in Brazil: what about obstetricians and gynecologists?Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2005
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L DuleyResource Centre for Randomised Trials, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LF. lelia.duley@ndm.ox.ac.uk
A M Gulmezoglu
University of Leeds · GBWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEclampsia, the occurrence of a seizure in association with pre-eclampsia, is a rare but serious complication of pregnancy. A number of different anticonvulsants are used to control eclamptic fits and to prevent further seizures.

objectivesThe aim of this review was to compare the effects of magnesium sulphate with those of lytic cocktail when used for the care of women with eclampsia. SEARCH STRATEGY: The register of trials held by the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group was searched for relevant trials. The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register in The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2000 was also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials recruiting women with eclampsia, and comparing any use of magnesium sulphate with any use of lytic cocktail. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted from each report without any blinding of the results or of the treatments which women received. MAIN

resultsTwo trials with 199 women were included in the review. These were both small and of average quality. Magnesium sulphate was better than lytic cocktail at preventing further fits (relative risk (RR) 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-0.24; risk difference (RD) 0.43, 95% CI -0.53, -0.34; number needed to treat (NNT) 3, 95% CI 2-3) and was associated with less respiratory depression (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.91). Magnesium sulphate was also associated with fewer maternal deaths than lytic cocktail, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.04-1.43). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsMagnesium sulphate is the anticonvulsant of choice for women with eclampsia. Lytic cocktail should be abandoned.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsChlorpromazineDrug CombinationsEclampsiaFemaleHumansMagnesium SulfateMeperidinePregnancyPromethazineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnticonvulsantsChlorpromazineDrug CombinationsMagnesium SulfateMeperidinePromethazine

Identifiers

PMID11279786
OpenAlexW4232830700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.