SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001
Intra-operative mitomycin C for glaucoma surgery.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcomes of Mitomycin-C augmented trabeculectomy using subconjunctival injections versus soaked sponges: a randomised controlled trial.Eye (London, England) · 2024Trial
- Effect of beta radiation on success of glaucoma drainage surgery in South Africa: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Trial
- Article
- Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C According to Concentration: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Intraoperative injection versus sponge-applied mitomycin C during trabeculectomy: One-year study.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Cataract extraction after deep sclerectomy and its effect on intraocular pressure control.Eye (London, England) · 2019Article
- Epigenetic Modification Prevents Excessive Wound Healing and Scar Formation After Glaucoma Filtration Surgery.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2016Article
- Outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and deep sclerectomy: a 10-year UK single-centre study.Eye (London, England) · 2015Article
- Suppression of avascular bleb formation by a thin biodegradable film in a rabbit filtration surgery with mitomycin C.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2012Article
- Review
- Building a safer trabeculectomy.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2006Article
- Five-year results of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2003Article
- Intraoperative InjectionJournal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
- Glaucoma Surgery with Soaked Sponges with Mitomycin C vs Sub-Tenon Injection: Short-term Outcomes.Journal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrabeculectomy is performed as a treatment for many types of glaucoma in an attempt to lower the intra-ocular pressure. Mitomycin C is an antimetabolite applied between the sclera and conjunctiva during the initial stages of a trabeculectomy to prevent excessive post-operative scarring and thus reduce the risk of failure.
objectivesThe objective of this review is to assess the effects of intra-operative application of mitomycin C in eyes of people undergoing trabeculectomy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group specialised register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register - CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the reference lists of relevant articles. We used the Science Citation Index to search for articles that cited the included studies. We contacted investigators and experts for details of additional relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials of intra-operative mitomycin C compared to placebo in trabeculectomy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted trial investigators for missing information. Data were summarised using relative risk, odds ratio and weighted mean difference. MAIN
resultsThis review includes 11 trials involving a total of 698 participants. The trials included three types of participants (those at high risk of failure, those undergoing trabeculectomy combined with cataract surgery, and those with no previous surgical intervention). Mitomycin C appears to be effective in reducing the relative risk of failure of trabeculectomy both in eyes at high risk of failure (relative risk 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.53) and those undergoing surgery for the first time (relative risk 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.53). No significant effect on failure was noted in the group undergoing trabeculectomy combined with cataract extraction. Mean intra-ocular pressure was significantly reduced at 12 months in all three participant groups receiving mitomycin C compared to placebo. No significant increase in permanent sight threatening complications was detected. Some evidence exists that mitomycin C increases the risk of cataract. The quality of trial reporting is poor in eight trials. Repeat analysis with three trials rated as low risk of bias did not yield different results. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsIntra-operative mitomycin C reduces the risk of surgical failure in eyes that have undergone no previous surgery and in eyes at high risk of failure. Compared to placebo it reduces mean intra-ocular pressure at 12 months in all groups of participants in this review. Apart from an increase in cataract formation following mitomycin C, no demonstrable significant increase in other side effects was detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.