SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001
Surgical procedures to evacuate incomplete abortion.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical procedures for evacuating incomplete miscarriage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage (less than 24 weeks).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of myrrh in patients with incomplete abortion: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Trial
- Spontaneous miscarriage/abortion in the first trimester and expectant management - a meta-analysis approach.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2023Article
- Hysteroscopic Resection for Missed Abortion: Feasibility, Operative Technique and Potential Benefit Compared to Curettage.Frontiers in surgery · 2020Article
- Effects of refresher training on the use of manual vacuum aspiration in the treatment of incomplete abortions: a quasi-experimental study in Malawi.BMJ global health · 2018Article
- Attributes and perspectives of public providers related to provision of medical abortion at public health facilities in Vietnam: a cross-sectional study in three provinces.International journal of women's health · 2014Article
- Article
- Evidence for perinatal and child health care guidelines in crisis settings: can Cochrane help?BMC public health · 2010Article
- Abortion in Turkey: women in rural areas and the law.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008Article
- Epidemiology of Maternal Mortality in Malawi.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncomplete abortion is a major problem that should be effectively managed with safe and appropriate procedures. Surgical evacuation of the uterus for management of incomplete abortion usually involves vacuum aspiration or sharp curettage.
objectivesTo compare the safety and effectiveness of surgical uterine evacuation methods for management of incomplete abortion. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, Medline from 1966, Popline from 1970, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Trials were also identified from reference lists of reviews. Date of last search: October 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials where different surgical methods were used to manage incomplete abortion were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted population characteristics, settings, and exclusion criteria, in addition to outcomes such as complications of the procedure, duration, need for re-evacuation, blood transfusion, and analgesia/anesthesia. MAIN
resultsTwo trials were included. Vacuum aspiration was associated with statistically significantly decreased blood loss (-17 mls weighted mean difference, 95% confidence interval (CI) -24 to -10 mls), less pain (relative risk (RR): 0.74, 95% CI 0.61, 0.90), and shorter duration of procedure (-1.2 minutes weighted mean difference, 95% CI -1.5 to -0.87 minutes), than sharp curettage, in the single study that evaluated these outcomes. Serious complications such as uterine perforation and other morbidity were rare and the sample sizes of the trials were not large enough to evaluate small or moderate differences. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsVacuum aspiration is safe, quick to perform, and less painful than sharp curettage, and should be recommended for use in the management of incomplete abortion. Analgesia and sedation should be provided as necessary for the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.