Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11279710›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001

Acupuncture for idiopathic headache.

D Melchart, K Linde, P Fischer, B Berman, A White, A Vickers, G Allais

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acupuncture for the prevention of episodic migraine.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Acupuncture for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Acupuncture for functional recovery after stroke: a systematic review of sham-controlled randomized clinical trials.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2010
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Acupuncture for tension-type headache.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  8. Acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  9. Acupuncture for lateral elbow pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Understandings of acupuncture application and mechanisms.American journal of translational research · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Acupuncture in the inpatient acute care setting: a pragmatic, randomized control trial.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D MelchartCentre for Complementary Medicine Research, Department of Internal Medicine II, Technische Universität, Kaiserstr. 9, Munich, Germany, 80801. Klaus.Linde@lrz.tu-muenchen.de
K Linde
P Fischer
B Berman
A White
A Vickers
G Allais

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcupuncture is widely used for the treatment of headache, but its effectiveness is controversial.

objectivesTo determine whether acupuncture is: - more effective than no treatment - more effective than 'sham' (placebo) acupuncture - as effective as other interventions used to treat idiopathic (primary) headaches. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the database of the Cochrane Field for Complementary Medicine. We also contacted researchers in the field and checked the bibliographies of all articles obtained. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized clinical trials comparing acupuncture with any type of control intervention for the treatment of idiopathic (primary) headaches were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Information on patients, interventions, methods, and results was extracted by at least two independent reviewers using a pre-tested standard form. Results on headache frequency and intensity were summarized descriptively. Responder rate ratios (responder rate in treatment group/responder rate in control group) were calculated as a crude indicator of results for sham-acupuncture-controlled trials. Quantitative meta-analysis was not possible due to trial heterogeneity and insufficient reporting. MAIN

resultsTwenty-six trials including a total of 1151 patients (median, 37; range, 10-150) met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen trials were conducted among patients with migraine, six among patients with tension-type headache, and four among patients with various types of headaches. The majority of trials had methodological and/or reporting shortcomings. In eight of the 16 trials comparing true and sham (placebo) acupuncture in migraine and tension-type headache patients, true acupuncture was reported to be significantly superior; in four trials there was a trend in favor of true acupuncture; and in two trials there was no difference between the two interventions. (Two trials were uninterpretable.) The 10 trials comparing acupuncture with other forms of treatment yielded contradictory results. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsOverall, the existing evidence supports the value of acupuncture for the treatment of idiopathic headaches. However, the quality and amount of evidence are not fully convincing. There is an urgent need for well-planned, large-scale studies to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture under real-life conditions.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyEvaluation Studies as TopicHeadacheHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.