Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11279707›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001

Mannitol for acute stroke.

D Bereczki, M Liu, G F do Prado, I Fekete

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Mannitol for acute stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Plasma osmolality in acute spontanious intra-cerebral hemorrhage: Does it influence hematoma volume and clinical outcome?Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Stroke management.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

D BereczkiDepartment of Neurology, University of Debrecen, Health Science and Medical Center, Nagyerdei krt. 98., Debrecen, Hungary, H-4012. bereczki@jaguar.dote.hu
M Liu
G F do Prado
I Fekete
University of Debrecen · HUUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMannitol is an osmotic agent and a free radical scavenger so it might decrease oedema and tissue damage in stroke.

objectivesTo test whether treatment with mannitol reduces short and long-term case fatality and dependency after acute ischaemic stroke or cerebral parenchymal haemorrhage. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Specialised Trials Register. In addition to this, supplementary MEDLINE searches were performed. The Chinese Stroke Trials Register was checked and the Latin-American databank LILACS was searched with the search term MANNITOL and its variations in the Portuguese and Spanish languages. A search was performed of Masters and Ph.D. degree theses in the databank of Sao Paulo University, and in abstracts of medical congresses on neurology and neurosurgery from 1965 to 1997 in Brazil. SELECTION CRITERIA: Truly randomised unconfounded clinical trials comparing the effect of mannitol with placebo or open control in patients with acute ischaemic stroke or parenchymal haemorrhage were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected the trials to be included in the review. After reaching an agreement on which trials to include, two of the reviewers extracted data from the trials and performed the data analysis. Accuracy of data extraction was checked by comparing the results. Included trials were tabulated for methodological quality including the method of randomisation and blinding, and stating if CT was performed, if patients were lost to follow-up and if intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Data synthesis and analysis was performed using the Cochrane Review Manager software. MAIN

resultsOnly one trial fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The number of included patients was small (36 treated and 41 controls) and the follow up was short. Neither beneficial nor harmful effects of mannitol could be proved. Case fatality, the proportion of dependent patients at the end of the follow up and side effects were not reported and were not available from the investigators. The planned outcome analyses and sensitivity analyses could not be performed due to lack of appropriate trials. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is currently not enough evidence to decide whether the routine use of mannitol in acute stroke would result in any beneficial or harmful effect. The routine use of mannitol in all patients with acute stroke is not supported by any evidence from randomised controlled clinical trials. Further trials are needed to confirm or refute the routine use of mannitol in acute stroke.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseBrain EdemaBrain IschemiaCerebral HemorrhageHumansMannitolRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicMannitol

Identifiers

PMID11279707
OpenAlexW4243549693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.