Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11279687›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2001

Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery for proximal femoral and other closed long bone fractures.

W J Gillespie, G Walenkamp

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in adults.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2011
    Review
  20. How to optimize patients for geriatric fracture surgery.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

W J GillespieDunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, NEW ZEALAND. bill.gillespie@stonebow.otago.ac.nz
G Walenkamp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWound infection and other hospital-acquired infections cause significant morbidity after internal fixation of fractures (osteosynthesis). The administration of antimicrobial agents (antibiotics) may reduce the frequency of infections.

objectivesTo determine whether the prophylactic administration of antibiotics in patients undergoing surgical management of hip or other long bone fractures reduces the incidence of wound and other hospital acquired infections. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the The Cochrane Library, Issue 3 2000; MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Current Contents, Dissertation Abstracts, and Index to UK Theses to August 2000. Bibliographies of identified articles were screened for further relevant trials. No language restriction was applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials involving - Participants: Any patients with a hip or other closed long bone fracture undergoing surgery for internal fixation or replacement arthroplasty.

interventionsAny regimen of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis administered at the time of surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Wound infection (deep and superficial), urinary tract infection, respiratory tract infection, adverse effects of prophylaxis, economic evaluations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently screened papers for inclusion, assessed trial quality using an eight item scale, and extracted data. Additional information was sought from two trialists. Pooled data are presented graphically. MAIN

resultsData from 8307 participants in 22 studies were analysed. In patients undergoing surgery for closed fracture fixation, single dose antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced deep wound infection (relative risk 0.40, 95%CI 0.24, 0.67) superficial wound infections, urinary infections, and respiratory tract infections. Multiple dose prophylaxis had an effect of similar size on deep wound infection (relative risk 0.40, 95%CI 0.24, 0.67), but significant effects on urinary and respiratory infections were not confirmed. Economic modelling using data from one large trial indicates that single dose prophylaxis with ceftriaxone is a cost-effective intervention. There are limited data for the incidence of adverse effects, but as expected they appear to be more common in those receiving antibiotics, compared with placebo or no prophylaxis. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsAntibiotic prophylaxis should be offered to those undergoing surgery for closed fracture fixation. On ethical grounds, further placebo controlled randomised trials of the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in closed fracture surgery are unlikely to be justified. Trials addressing the cost-effectiveness of different effective antibiotic regimens would need to be very large.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisOrthopedic ProceduresArthroplastyFemoral FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, ClosedHip FracturesHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.