ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2001
Analysis of gene induction and arrest site transcription in yeast with mutations in the transcription elongation machinery.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Writing a wrong: Coupled RNA polymerase II transcription and RNA quality control.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2019Review
- Basic mechanisms of RNA polymerase II activity and alteration of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2013Review
- Evidence that the elongation factor TFIIS plays a role in transcription initiation at GAL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Molecular and cellular biology · 2005Article
- mRNA capping enzyme activity is coupled to an early transcription elongation.Molecular and cellular biology · 2004Article
- In vivo evidence that defects in the transcriptional elongation factors RPB2, TFIIS, and SPT5 enhance upstream poly(A) site utilization.Molecular and cellular biology · 2003Article
- Regulation of an IMP dehydrogenase gene and its overexpression in drug-sensitive transcription elongation mutants of yeast.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In vitro, transcript elongation by RNA polymerase II is impeded by DNA sequences, DNA-bound proteins, and small ligands. Transcription elongation factor SII (TFIIS) assists RNA polymerase II to transcribe through these obstacles. There is however, little direct evidence that SII-responsive arrest sites function in living cells nor that SII facilitates readthrough in vivo. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains lacking elongation factor SII and/or containing a point mutation in the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II, which slows the enzyme's RNA elongation rate, grow slowly and have defects in mRNA metabolism, particularly in the presence of nucleotide-depleting drugs. Here we have examined transcriptional induction in strains lacking SII or containing the slow polymerase mutation. Both mutants and a combined double mutant were defective in induction of GAL1 and ENA1. This was not due to an increase in mRNA degradation and was independent of any drug treatment, although treatment with the nucleotide-depleting drug 6-azauracil exacerbated the effect preferentially in the mutants. These data are consistent with mutants in the Elongator complex, which show slow inductive responses. When a potent in vitro arrest site was transcribed in these strains, there was no perceptible effect upon mRNA accumulation. These data suggest that an alternative elongation surveillance mechanism exists in vivo to overcome arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.