Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11276431›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2001

Brassica genomics: a complement to, and early beneficiary of, the Arabidopsis sequence.

A H Paterson, T H Lan, R Amasino, T C Osborn, C Quiros

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Their C-termini divideFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Carbohydrate microarrays and their use for the identification of molecular markers for plant cell wall composition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  6. Flowering Time Gene Variation inFrontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Development of full-length cDNAs from Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa Subsp. pekinensis) and identification of marker genes for defence response.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A H PatersonCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, Riverbend Research Lab, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. paterson@uga.edu
T H Lan
R Amasino
T C Osborn
C Quiros

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Those studying the genus Brassica will be among the early beneficiaries of the now-completed Arabidopsis sequence. The remarkable morphological diversity of Brassica species and their relatives offers valuable opportunities to advance our knowledge of plant growth and development, and our understanding of rapid phenotypic evolution.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsArabidopsisBrassicaComputational BiologyCrops, AgriculturalEvolution, Molecular

Identifiers

PMID11276431
PMCPMC138917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.