Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11276425›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2001

Survey of transcripts in the adult Drosophila brain.

K L Posey, L B Jones, R Cerda, M Bajaj, T Huynh, P E Hardin, S H Hardin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in neurology · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K L PoseyDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5513, USA.
L B Jones
R Cerda
M Bajaj
T Huynh
P E Hardin
S H Hardin
University of Houston · US

Funding

SEQUENCING WITH SHORT OLIGONUCLEOTIDESR29HG001151 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI HARDIN, SUSAN H · 1994 to 1998
–
NHGRI NIH HHS R29-HG01151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClassic methods of identifying genes involved in neural function include the laborious process of behavioral screening of mutagenized flies and then rescreening candidate lines for pleiotropic effects due to developmental defects. To accelerate the molecular analysis of brain function in Drosophila we constructed a cDNA library exclusively from adult brains. Our goal was to begin to develop a catalog of transcripts expressed in the brain. These transcripts are expected to contain a higher proportion of clones that are involved in neuronal function.

resultsThe library contains approximately 6.75 million independent clones. From our initial characterization of 271 randomly chosen clones, we expect that approximately 11% of the clones in this library will identify transcribed sequences not found in expressed sequence tag databases. Furthermore, 15% of these 271 clones are not among the 13,601 predicted Drosophila genes.

conclusionsOur analysis of this unique Drosophila brain library suggests that the number of genes may be underestimated in this organism. This work complements the Drosophila genome project by providing information that facilitates more complete annotation of the genomic sequence. This library should be a useful resource that will help in determining how basic brain functions operate at the molecular level.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAgingAnimalsBrainCloning, MolecularDarknessDNA, ComplementaryDrosophila melanogasterExpressed Sequence TagsGene Expression RegulationGene LibraryGenes, InsectGenomeGenomicsHumansLightDNA, ComplementaryRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID11276425
PMCPMC30707
OpenAlexW1849887832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.