Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11273720›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2001

The molecular genetic basis for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

A J Marian, R Roberts

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 443 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy-Associated CRYABInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dilated cardiomyopathy due to novel LMNA mutation: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A J MarianSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. amarian@bcm.tmc.edu
R Roberts
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA IN CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE--MECHANISMS/RELEVANCEP50HL054313 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MANN, DOUGLAS LOWELL · 1995 to 2004
$8.2M
SCOR IN HEART FAILUREP50HL042267 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ROBERTS, ROBERT · 1990 to 1994
–
NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL054313NHLBI NIH HHS P50-HL42267-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a relatively common disease, is diagnosed clinically by unexplained cardiac hypertrophy and pathologically by myocyte hypertrophy, disarray, and interstitial fibrosis. HCM is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the young and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly. Hypertrophy and fibrosis are the major determinants of morbidity and SCD. More than 100 mutations in nine genes, all encoding sarcomeric proteins have been identified in patients with HCM, which had led to the notion that HCM is a disease of contractile sarcomeric proteins. The beta -myosin heavy chain (MyHC), cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and myosin binding protein-C (MyBP-C) are the most common genes accounting for approximately 2/3 of all HCM cases. Genotype-phenotype correlation studies suggest that mutations in the beta -MyHC gene are associated with more extensive hypertrophy and a higher risk of SCD as compared to mutations in genes coding for other sarcomeric proteins, such as MyBP-C and cTnT. The prognostic significance of mutations is related to their hypertrophic expressivity and penetrance, with the exception of those in the cTnT, which are associated with mild hypertrophic response and a high incidence of SCD. However, there is a significant variability and factors, such as modifier genes and probably the environmental factors affect the phenotypic expression of HCM. The molecular pathogenesis of HCM is not completely understood. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that mutations impart a diverse array of functional defects including reduced ATPase activity of myosin, acto-myosin interaction, cross-bridging kinetics, myocyte contractility, and altered Ca2+ sensitivity. Hypertrophy and other clinical and pathological phenotypes are considered compensatory phenotypes secondary to functional defects. In summary, the molecular genetic basis of HCM has been identified, which affords the opportunity to delineate its pathogenesis. Understanding the pathogenesis of HCM could provide for genetic based diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment and prevention of cardiac phenotypes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicDisease Models, AnimalGenotypeHumansMiceMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID11273720
PMCPMC2901497
OpenAlexW1967800726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.