Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11271892›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2001

Blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients: clinical performance of general practitioners.

B D Frijling, T H Spies, C M Lobo, M E Hulscher, B B van Drenth, J C Braspenning, A Prins, J C van der Wouden, R P Grol

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Educational and organisational interventions used to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Organisational factors in relation to control of blood pressure: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Are guidelines ethical? Some considerations for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Is there a tension between doctors' duty of care and evidence-based medicine?Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2002
    Article
  19. Ageing Britain--challenges and opportunities for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B D FrijlingCentre for Quality of Care Research, University of Nijmegen, P O Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. b.frijling@hsv.kun.nl
T H Spies
C M Lobo
M E Hulscher
B B van Drenth
J C Braspenning
A Prins
J C van der Wouden
R P Grol
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe blood pressure of many treated hypertensive patients remains above recommended target levels. This discrepancy may be related to general practitioners' (GPs') actions.

aimTo assess clinical performance of GPs in blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients and to explore the influence of patient and GP characteristics on clinical performance. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional study conducted on 195 GPs with invitations to participate made via bulletins and by letter.

settingOne hundred and thirty-two practices in the southern half of The Netherlands from November 1996 to April 1997.

methodPerformance criteria were selected from Dutch national hypertension guidelines for general practice. GPs completed self-report forms immediately after follow-up visits of hypertensive patients treated with antihypertensive medication.

resultsThe GPs recorded 3526 follow-up visits. In 63% of these consultations the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was 90 mmHg or above. The median performance rates of the GPs were less than 51% for most of the recommended actions, even at a DBP of > or = 100 mmHg. Performance of non-pharmacological actions increased gradually with increasing DBP; prescribing an increase in antihypertensive medication and making a follow-up appointment scheduled within six weeks rose steeply at a DBP of > or = 100 mmHg. Patient and GP characteristics contributed little to clinical performance. Action performance rates varied considerably between GPs.

conclusionGPs seem to target their actions at a DBP of below 100 mmHg, whereas guidelines recommend targeting at a DBP of below 90 mmHg.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID11271892
PMCPMC1313918
OpenAlexW100581606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.