ReviewDrugs2001
New insights into the second generation antihistamines.
Review in Drugs, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the risk of drowsiness and sedation between levocetirizine and desloratadine: a prescription-event monitoring study in England.Drug safety · 2006Trial
- Gender and age variations in neuropsychiatric adverse events of cetirizine and levocetirizine: a disproportionality analysis of ICSRs from FAERS and EudraVigilance data.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- Mast cell-mediated immune regulation in health and disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Mast Cell: A Multi-Functional Master Cell.Frontiers in immunology · 2015Review
- Determination of stress-induced degradation products of cetirizine dihydrochloride by a stability-indicating RP-HPLC method.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2014Article
- Bilastine: a new nonsedating oral H1 antihistamine for treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria.BioMed research international · 2013Article
- Examining the utilization and tolerability of the non-sedating antihistamine levocetirizine in England using prescription-event monitoring data.Drug safety · 2011Article
- The anti-inflammatory effects of levocetirizine--are they clinically relevant or just an interesting additional effect?Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2009Article
- Synthesis, structure-affinity relationships, and modeling of AMDA analogs at 5-HT2A and H1 receptors: structural factors contributing to selectivity.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2009Article
- Histamine directly and synergistically with lipopolysaccharide stimulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandin I(2) and E(2) production in human coronary artery endothelial cells.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2007Article
- Methods of assessment and clinical relevance of QT dynamics.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal · 2005Article
- Article
- Role of histamine and platelet-activating factor in allergic rhinitis.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2004Review
- Review
- Article
- Safety of non-antiarrhythmic drugs that prolong the QT interval or induce torsade de pointes: an overview.Drug safety · 2002Review
- Consensus Statement for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urticaria: A 2017 Update.Indian journal of dermatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Second generation antihistamines are recognised as being highly effective treatments for allergy-based disease and are among the most frequently prescribed and safest drugs in the world. However, consideration of the therapeutic index or the benefit/risk ratio of the H1 receptor antagonists is of paramount importance when prescribing this class of compounds as they are used to treat non-life threatening conditions. There are many second generation antihistamines available and at first examination these appear to be comparable in terms of safety and efficacy. However, the newer antihistamines in fact represent a heterogeneous group of compounds, having markedly differing chemical structures, adverse effects, half-life, tissue distribution and metabolism, spectrum of antihistaminic properties, and varying degrees of anti-inflammatory effects. With regard to the latter, there is growing awareness that some of these compounds might represent useful adjunct medications in asthma therapy. In terms of safety issues, the current second generation grouping includes compounds with proven cardiotoxic effects and others with the potential for adverse drug interactions. Moreover, some of the second generation H1 antagonists have given cause for concern regarding their potential to cause a degree of somnolence in some individuals. It can be argued, therefore, that the present second generation grouping is too large and indistinct since this was based primarily on the concept of separating the first generation sedating compounds from nonsedating H1 antagonists. Although it is too early to talk about a third generation grouping of antihistamines, future membership of such a classification could be based on a low volume of distribution coupled with a lack of sedating effects, drug interactions and cardiotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11270939What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.