ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2001
Effect of diet on changes in small intestinal blood flow following intracolonic administration of indomethacin to rats.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microcirculatory changes in experimental mesenteric longitudinal ulcers of the small intestine in rats.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid diet (LD) is known to be protective against indomethacin-induced enteropathy, which is thought to be associated with ischemic change. We tested the hypothesis that the solid component of diet modulates small intestinal blood flow (SIBF) following indomethacin administration. In the first experiment, male Wistar rats were divided into 18-hr-fasted and normal diet groups. Indomethacin (20 mg/kg) or vehicle was administered intracolonically. SIBF was measured on both the mesenteric and antimesenteric sides of the intestine, using the hydrogen gas clearance method. In the second experiment, rats were given LD alone or LD with increasing concentration of soluble/insoluble fiber for seven days. The baseline SIBF was significantly higher in the groups with normal diet and LD with fiber than in the fasting and LD groups. Following indomethacin administration, SIBF gradually decreased in the groups with normal diet and LD with insoluble fiber, while neither liquid diet nor fasting reduced SIBF. There was no difference in SIBF between the mesenteric and antimesenteric sides of the intestine in any group. Our findings suggest that solid components of diet increase basal SIBF and decrease SIBF following indomethacin administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.