Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11265247›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2001

Antigen processing by the proteasome.

P M Kloetzel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 258 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
258citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

258 citing papers in PubMed, 629 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. BAG2 Condensates Couple Proteostasis to CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Role of Tumor Cell Intrinsic and Host Autophagy in Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

198 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P M KloetzelInstitut für Biochemie, Medical Faculty, Charité, Humboldt University, Monbijoustrasse 2, 10117 Berlin, Germany. p-m.kloetzel@charite.de
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proteasome is an essential part of our immune surveillance mechanisms: by generating peptides from intracellular antigens it provides peptides that are then 'presented' to T cells. But proteasomes--the waste-disposal units of the cell--typically do not generate peptides for antigen presentation with high efficiency. How, then, does the proteasome adapt to serve the immune system well?

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationAntigensCysteine EndopeptidasesModels, MolecularMultienzyme ComplexesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexUbiquitinsAntigensCysteine EndopeptidasesMultienzyme ComplexesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexUbiquitins

Identifiers

PMID11265247
OpenAlexW2793859699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.