Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11265174›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2000

Chlamydia pneumoniae in vitro and in vivo: a critical evaluation of in situ detection methods.

A Meijer, P J Roholl, S K Gielis-Proper, Y F Meulenberg, J M Ossewaarde

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chlamydophila abortus infection in a pregnant woman associated with indirect contact with infected goats.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2004
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A MeijerResearch Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. Adam.Meijer@rivm.nl
P J Roholl
S K Gielis-Proper
Y F Meulenberg
J M Ossewaarde
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThere is a considerable discrepancy between data from the detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in atherosclerotic lesions obtained by means of immunocytochemistry and data obtained using the polymerase chain reaction. This study evaluated methods for the in situ detection and assessment of the viability of C pneumoniae bacteria.

methodsChlamydia pneumoniae membrane protein, heat shock protein 60, and lipopolysaccharide were detected by immunocytochemistry, and genomic DNA and 16S rRNA by in situ hybridisation in paraffin wax embedded sections of cultured HEp2 cells infected with C pneumoniae and of lungs from mice infected intranasally with C pneumoniae.

resultsInclusions reactive for all three antigens, DNA, and 16S rRNA were seen in infected HEp2 cells, in all positive bronchus and alveolar epithelial cells, and in some of the positive infiltrate cells in the lungs of mice up to seven days after infection. In all alveolar macrophages and in the infiltrate cells positive for antigens only, the staining pattern was granularly dispersed throughout the cytoplasm up to seven days after infection. At 21 days after infection, only this granular staining pattern was seen for antigens in infiltrate cells and macrophages in the alveoli and bronchus associated lymphoid tissue. At this time point, DNA or 16S rRNA were detected sporadically, but always as inclusion-like staining.

conclusionsBecause antigens with an inclusion-like staining were detected only together with DNA and 16S rRNA, this type of staining pattern suggested the presence of viable bacteria. Thus, the granular staining pattern of antigens in the absence of staining for DNA and 16S is most likely caused by non-viable bacteria. In conclusion, these methods are suitable for the in situ detection of C pneumoniae and the assessment of its viability.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, BacterialCell Culture TechniquesChlamydophila InfectionsChlamydophila pneumoniaeDNA, BacterialFemaleImmunoenzyme TechniquesIn Situ HybridizationLungMiceMice, Inbred C57BLParaffin EmbeddingRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntigens, BacterialDNA, BacterialRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID11265174
PMCPMC1731138
OpenAlexW2154720089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.