Model for directly assessing and improving clinical competence and performance in revalidation of clinicians.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Growing Pains at Hospitals: Opportunities and Issues of Service Expansion in Maximum Care.Frontiers in medicine · 2017
   Article
2. Summative clinical competency assessment: A survey of ultrasound practitioners' views.Ultrasound (Leeds, England) · 2015
   Article
3. Rating general practitioner consultation performance in cancer care: does the specialty of assessors matter? A simulated patient study.BMC family practice · 2014
   Article
4. Using the method of judgement analysis to address variations in diagnostic decision making.BMC research notes · 2012
   Article
5. Patient feedback in revalidation: an exploratory study using the consultation satisfaction questionnaire.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
   Article
6. Family physicians' reactions to performance assessment feedback.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2006
   Article
7. Patients, professionalism, and revalidation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005
   Article
8. The feasibility of using pattern recognition software to measure the influence of computer use on the consultation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2003
   Article
9. Measuring consultation skills in primary care in England: evaluation and development of content of the MAAS scale.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
   Article
10. Assessing clinical competence and revalidation of clinicians. Simulated surgeries would have advantages.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Assessing clinical competence and revalidation of clinicians. Video assessments might be effective screening method.2001
• Commented on by
  Assessing clinical competence and revalidation of clinicians. Simulated surgeries would have advantages.2001
• Commented on by
  Assessing clinical competence and revalidation of clinicians. Results from pilot study using portfolio and 360 degrees questionnaire.2001

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as