Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11258700›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2001

Molecular and cytological analysis of a 5.5 Mb minichromosome.

C Auriche, P Donini, F Ascenzioni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. De novo formed satellite DNA-based mammalian artificial chromosomes and their possible applications.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2015
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Functional analysis of the Arabidopsis centromere by T-DNA insertion-induced centromere breakage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C AuricheIstituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Dipartimento di Biologia Cellulare e dello Sviluppo, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy.
P Donini
F Ascenzioni
Istituto Pasteur · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian artificial chromosomes (MACs) provide a new tool for the improvement of our knowledge of chromosome structure and function. Moreover, they constitute an alternative and potentially powerful tool for gene delivery both in cultured cells and for the production of transgenic animals. In the present work we describe the molecular structure of MC1, a human minichromosome derived from chromosome 1. By means of restriction and hybridization analysis, satellite-PCR, in situ hybridization on highly extended chromatin fibres, and indirect immunofluorescence, we have established that: (i) MC1 has a size of 5.5 Mb; (ii) it consists of 1.1 Mb alphoid, 3.5 Mb Sat2 DNA, and telomeric and subtelomeric sequences at both ends; (iii) it contains an unusual region of interspersed Sat2 and alphoid DNAs at the junction of the alphoid and the Sat2 blocks; and (iv) the two alphoid blocks and the Sat2-alphoid region bind centromeric proteins suggesting that they participate in the formation of a functional kinetochore.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCentromereCHO CellsChromatinChromosomes, Artificial, HumanChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Cloning, MolecularCricetinaeDNA, SatelliteFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansHybrid CellsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionChromatinDNA, Satellite

Identifiers

PMID11258700
PMCPMC1083814
OpenAlexW1982082191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.