Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11255897›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2001

Symptoms, signs, and prescribing for acute lower respiratory tract illness.

W F Holmes, J T Macfarlane, R M Macfarlane, R Hubbard

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Amoxicillin for acute lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: subgroup analysis of potential high-risk groups.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Trial
  6. Predicting the duration of symptoms in lower respiratory tract infection.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reducing uncertainty in managing respiratory tract infections in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  16. Aetiology and prediction of pneumonia in lower respiratory tract infection in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
  17. Antibiotic prescribing for acute cough: the effect of perceived patient demand.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
  18. SAPC: scotching the myths.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
  19. Article
  20. A diagnostic rule for the aetiology of lower respiratory tract infections as guidance for antimicrobial treatment.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W F HolmesUniversity of Nottingham. holmes@mail.com
J T Macfarlane
R M Macfarlane
R Hubbard
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients who consult with acute lower respiratory symptoms receive antibiotics, usually without evidence of significant infection. The physical signs at presentation of acute lower respiratory tract illness and the rate at which symptoms resolve and normal activities recover is not well documented.

aimTo examine in patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTi), their physical signs at presentation, their relationship to antibiotic prescribing, and symptom resolution and resumption of normal activities. DESIGN OF STUDY: Analysis of data collected prospectively during presentation of acute LRTi in primary care and from patient symptom diary cards.

settingForty GPs who were members of an informal Community Respiratory Infection Interest Group recruited 391 patients to the study.

methodInformation was collected on pulse, oral temperature, respiratory rate, abnormalities on auscultation, and details of any antibiotic prescription. Patients completed symptom diary cards for the following 10 days.

resultsOf the 391 patients who consulted 71% received antibiotics. A minority had abnormal physical signs: 17% had a pulse greater than 90 bpm, 15% a respiratory rate greater than 20 breaths per minute, 4% had a temperature greater than 38 degrees C, and 25% had an abnormality on auscultation. Antibiotic prescribing was more common in the presence of abnormal chest signs (odds ratio = 8.71, 95% confidence interval = 3.69-20.61) or discoloured sputum (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 1.57-4.56). Ten days after consultation, 58% of patients were still coughing and 29% had not returned to normal activities.

conclusionAbnormal physical signs at presentation do not explain the high rates of antibiotic prescribing nor do they predict persisting cough and functional impairment at 10 days. Reconsultation for the same symptoms within a month is common and is strongly related to persisting cough, but not abnormalities at presentation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsConfidence IntervalsFemaleHumansMaleOdds RatioPhysical ExaminationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareProspective StudiesRecurrenceRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID11255897
PMCPMC1313947
OpenAlexW2166894975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.