Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11251042›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2001

The facilitated component of intestinal glucose absorption.

G L Kellett

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04206579 (Oral 10% Dextrose Versus Sodium Dextrose Formula in Performance of Soccer Athlete. A Double-Blind Cross Over Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04206579 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Oral 10% Dextrose Versus Sodium Dextrose Formula in Performance of Soccer Athlete. A Double-Blind Cross Over Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHasanuddin UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled30ConditionsAthletesArms10% Dextrose, Natrium Dextrose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 292 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Inhibitory Effect ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enhancing probiotic impact: engineeringApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G L KellettDepartment of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK. glk1@york.ac.uk
University of York · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, a debate has developed about the mechanism of the passive or 'diffusive' component of intestinal glucose absorption and, indeed, whether it even exists. Pappenheimer and colleagues have proposed that paracellular solvent drag contributes a passive component, which, at high concentrations of sugars similar to those in the jejunal lumen immediately after a meal, is severalfold greater than the active component mediated by the Na+-glucose cotransporter SGLT1. On the other hand, Ferraris & Diamond maintain that the kinetics of glucose absorption can be explained solely in terms of SGLT1 and that a passive or paracellular component plays little, if any, part. Recently, we have provided new evidence that the passive component of glucose absorption exists, but is in fact facilitated since it is mediated by the rapid, glucose-dependent activation and recruitment of the facilitative glucose transporter GLUT2 to the brush-border membrane; regulation involves a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent pathway activated by glucose transport through SGLT1 and also involves mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase) signalling pathways. This topical review seeks to highlight the significant points of the debate, to show how our proposals on GLUT2 impact on different aspects of the debate and to look at the regulatory events that are likely to be involved in the short-term regulation of sugar absorption during the assimilation of a meal.

Indexed as

AbsorptionAnimalsCarbohydrate MetabolismFructoseGlucoseGlucose Transporter Type 2HumansIntestinal MucosaMembrane GlycoproteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsSignal TransductionSodium-Glucose Transporter 1FructoseGlucoseGlucose Transporter Type 2Membrane GlycoproteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsSLC5A1 protein, humanSodium-Glucose Transporter 1

Identifiers

PMID11251042
PMCPMC2278489
OpenAlexW2024530909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.