ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2001
Protective effect of a PAR2-activating peptide on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in guinea-pig.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Protease-Activated Receptor-2-Activating Peptide on Guinea Pig Airway Resistance and Isolated Tracheal Strips.Journal of microscopy and ultrastructureArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Protease activated receptor-2 (PAR2) is a seven transmembrane domain G protein coupled receptor proteolytically activated. PAR2, together with other PARs, can be also activated by peptides mimicking the sequence of the receptor tethered ligand. We have evaluated the effect of systemic administration of a peptide activating PAR2 (PAR2-AP, SLIGRL) on histamine-induced increase in lung resistances in the guinea-pig. 2. Intravenous administration of PAR2-AP (1 mg kg(-1)) significantly inhibited histamine-induced increase in lung resistance in a time-dependent fashion that was not abolished by indomethacin or vagotomy. 3. Bronchoprotective effect of PAR2-AP was not reversed by the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin, the nitric oxide synthetase inhibitor, L-NAME, nor by the non-selective beta-antagonist, propranolol. 4. Indomethacin augmented the bronchoconstriction to histamine which was inhibited by PAR2-AP. Furthermore, in vagotomized animals, the bronchial hyper-responsiveness to histamine was significantly reduced, and in these circumstances, PAR2-AP still retained the capacity to provide bronchoprotection against histamine. 5. PAR2-AP also produced a modest reduction in histamine-induced protein leakage in trachea and upper bronchi. 6. Our results indicated that PAR2 might have a bronchoprotective role in the guinea-pig in vivo independent of prostaglandin or nitric oxide release.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.