ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001
Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing attitudes of patient-centered care among chiropractic students at a South African university.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2022Article
- Review
- Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Article
- Comparing the quality of pro- and anti-vaccination online information: a content analysis of vaccination-related webpages.BMC public health · 2016Article
- Shared decision making: using health information technology to integrate patient choice into primary care.Translational behavioral medicine · 2011Article
- Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010Article
- Considering 'balance' in information.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2007Article
- [Effects of a shared decision making model in psychiatric and neurologic practice].Der Nervenarzt · 2006Article
- Decision aids in routine practice: lessons from the breast cancer initiative.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2006Article
- Integrating Decision Making and Mental Health Interventions Research: Research Directions.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2006Article
- Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2005Article
- Assessing and using the multiple correlated components of the burden of disease in decision-making in health care.Health care management science · 2005Article
- Portals to Wonderland: health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2005Article
- The importance of drug adverse effects compared with seizure control for people with epilepsy: a discrete choice experiment.PharmacoEconomics · 2005Article
- Ensuring quality information for patients: development and preliminary validation of a new instrument to improve the quality of written health care information.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2004Review
- Are guidelines ethical? Some considerations for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002Article
- After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.Quality & safety in health care · 2002Article
- Qualitative Evaluation of Medical Information Processing Needs of 60 Women Choosing Ovarian Cancer Surveillance or Prophylactic Oophorectomy.Journal of genetic counseling · 2002Article
- Patient-centered diabetes self-management education.Current diabetes reports · 2002Review
- After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.