ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2001
The mammary myoepithelial cell--Cinderella or ugly sister?
Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: molecular features and clinical significance.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- A closer look into the cellular and molecular biology of myoepithelial cells across various exocrine glands.The ocular surface · 2024Review
- Re-evaluation of the myoepithelial cells roles in the breast cancer progression.Cancer cell international · 2022Review
- Mechanostimulation of breast myoepithelial cells induces functional changes associated with DCIS progression to invasion.NPJ breast cancer · 2022Article
- Metachronous Pancreatic and Thyroid Metastases from Primary Soft-Tissue Myoepithelioma in the Clavicular Region: A Case Report of a Long-Term Survivor.The American journal of case reports · 2020Article
- Expression of Myoepithelial Markers in Mammary Carcinomas of 119 Pet Rabbits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Perturbed myoepithelial cell differentiation in BRCA mutation carriers and in ductal carcinoma in situ.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Dachshund Depletion Disrupts Mammary Gland Development and Diverts the Composition of the Mammary Gland Progenitor Pool.Stem cell reports · 2019Article
- MIND model for triple-negative breast cancer in syngeneic mice for quick and sequential progression analysis of lung metastasis.PloS one · 2018Article
- Mammography and ultrasound effective features in differentiating basal-like and normal-like subtypes of triple negative breast cancer.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Identification of a novel p53 target, COL17A1, that inhibits breast cancer cell migration and invasion.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Myoepithelial cells in lobular carcinoma in situ: distribution and immunophenotype.Human pathology · 2016Article
- Breast cancer risk factor associations differ for pure versus invasive carcinoma with an in situ component in case-control and case-case analyses.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2016Article
- Hypoxia-induced nitric oxide release by luminal cells stimulates proliferation and uPA secretion of myoepithelial cells in a bicellular murine mammary tumor.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2015Article
- Molecular homology and difference between spontaneous canine mammary cancer and human breast cancer.Cancer research · 2014Article
- Myoepithelial carcinoma of the breast.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2013Article
- Active roles of tumor stroma in breast cancer metastasis.International journal of breast cancer · 2012Article
- Expression and role of fibroblast activation protein-alpha in microinvasive breast carcinoma.Diagnostic pathology · 2011Article
- Nottingham Prognostic Index in triple-negative breast cancer: a reliable prognostic tool?BMC cancer · 2011Article
- Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience?Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The breast myoepithelial cell is the Cinderella of mammary biology. Although its contribution to benign and some malignant pathologies is recognised, it has been largely neglected in molecular and biological studies. The reason for this has been the perception that its role in normal physiology is confined to lactation and the belief that most breast cancers arise from luminal epithelial cells. This review presents our perspective on its broader biological significance and its potential use as a model system for understanding breast carcinogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.