Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11250694›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2000

Founder populations and their uses for breast cancer genetics.

S L Neuhausen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Molecular Characterization of the Allelic Expression of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Pathogenic Germline DNA Repair Gene andJCO precision oncology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic variation of the brca1 and brca2 genes in macedonian patients.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. BRCA1 4153delA founder mutation in Russian ovarian cancer patients.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2006
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S L NeuhausenUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. susan@episun5.med.utah.edu

Funding

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BREAST CANCER--BRCA1 AND BRCA2R01CA074415 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NEUHAUSEN, SUSAN L. · 1998 to 2007
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA074415NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 74415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous founder mutations have been reported in BRCA1 and BRCA2. For genetic screening of a population with a founder mutation, testing can be targeted to the mutation, allowing for a more rapid and less expensive test. In addition, more precise estimates of the prior probability of carrying a mutation and of the likelihood of a mutation carrier developing cancer should be possible. For a given founder mutation a large number of carriers are available, so that focused scientific studies of penetrance, expression, and genetic and environmental modifiers of risk can be performed. Finally, founder populations may be a powerful resource to localize additional breast cancer susceptibility loci, because of the reduction in locus heterogeneity.

Indexed as

HeterozygoteMutationAdultAgedBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genetic TestingHumansMaleNeoplasm ProteinsPenetranceProbabilityRisk FactorsTranscription FactorsBRCA2 ProteinNeoplasm ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID11250694
PMCPMC139426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.