Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11250684›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2000

Mouse models for breast cancer.

L Hennighausen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Engineering Breast Cancer On-chip-Moving Toward Subtype Specific Models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  5. Breast cancer and cytomegalovirus.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Review
  6. Immunogenicity of rat-neuScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Deregulation of the Hippo pathway in mouse mammary stem cells promotes mammary tumorigenesis.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Mouse models of breast cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

L HennighausenNational Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. hennighausen@nih.gov

Funding

Genetic Approaches To Understanding Organ Development and FunctionZIADK061000 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI HENNIGHAUSEN, LOTHAR · 2009 to 2025
$24.7M
Genetic Understanding Of Organ Development And FunctionZ01DK061000 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI HENNIGHAUSEN, LOTHAR · 1998 to 2008
$851k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalAnimalsCell CycleFemaleMammary Tumor Virus, MouseMiceMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID11250684
PMCPMC521205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.