Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11238422›Full record

ArticleGenetics2001

Determination of the number of conserved chromosomal segments between species.

S Kumar, S R Gadagkar, A Filipski, X Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Random, fragile, or correlated: Mechanisms of synteny decay in mammals.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evolution's cauldron: duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mutation rates in mammalian genomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S KumarDepartment of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1501, USA. s.kumar@asu.edu
S R Gadagkar
A Filipski
X Gu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic divergence between species can be quantified in terms of the number of chromosomal rearrangements that have occurred in the respective genomes following their divergence from a common ancestor. These rearrangements disrupt the structural similarity between genomes, with each rearrangement producing additional, albeit shorter, conserved segments. Here we propose a simple statistical approach on the basis of the distribution of the number of markers in contiguous sets of autosomal markers (CSAMs) to estimate the number of conserved segments. CSAM identification requires information on the relative locations of orthologous markers in one genome and only the chromosome number on which each marker resides in the other genome. We propose a simple mathematical model that can account for the effect of the nonuniformity of the breakpoints and markers on the observed distribution of the number of markers in different conserved segments. Computer simulations show that the number of CSAMs increases linearly with the number of chromosomal rearrangements under a variety of conditions. Using the CSAM approach, the estimate of the number of conserved segments between human and mouse genomes is 529 +/- 84, with a mean conserved segment length of 2.8 cM. This length is <40% of that currently accepted for human and mouse genomes. This means that the mouse and human genomes have diverged at a rate of approximately 1.15 rearrangements per million years. By contrast, mouse and rat are diverging at a rate of only approximately 0.74 rearrangements per million years.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceGenetic MarkersModels, GeneticSpecies SpecificityAnimalsChromosomesComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationHumansMiceModels, TheoreticalRatsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID11238422
PMCPMC1461575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.