ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001
Is bigger better for primary care groups and trusts?
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of new forms of large-scale general practice provider collaborations on England's NHS: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018Pooled it
- Does practice size matter? Review of effects on quality of care in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013Pooled it
- The Association Between Panel Size and Health Outcomes of Patients with Hypertension in Urban China: a Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Reorganising health and social care in Québec: a journey towards integrating care through mergers.London journal of primary care · 2018Article
- Productivity Growth in the English National Health Service from 1998/1999 to 2013/2014.Health economics · 2017Article
- Is cancer survival associated with cancer symptom awareness and barriers to seeking medical help in England? An ecological study.British journal of cancer · 2016Article
- Is burnout associated with referral rates among primary care physicians in community clinics?Family practice · 2014Article
- Association between primary care organisation population size and quality of commissioning in England: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012Article
- Biomarkers, bundled payments, and colorectal cancer care.Genes & cancer · 2012Article
- GPs with special interests: unanswered questions.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007Article
- Primary care trusts.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Article
- Process and impact of mergers of NHS trusts: multicentre case study and management cost analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Article
- Edge of chaos.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2002Article
- Is bigger better for primary care groups and trusts? Small can be beautiful and effective.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
- Tackling organisational change in the new NHS.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
- Is bigger better for primary care groups and trusts?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Review
- The development of integrated health care models in Scotland.International journal of integrated care · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.