Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11238152›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001

Effect of peer led programme for asthma education in adolescents: cluster randomised controlled trial.

S Shah, J K Peat, E J Mazurski, H Wang, D Sindhusake, C Bruce, R L Henry, P G Gibson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07222696 (Pilot Randomized Trial of Health Coaching for People With Rheumatoid Arthritis to Improve Mental Well-Being), which is not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07222696 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Randomized Trial of Health Coaching for People With Rheumatoid Arthritis to Improve Mental Well-Being

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2026 to 2030Enrolled250ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis (RAArmsPeer Coach, Healthy Horizons
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Lay-led and peer support interventions for adolescents with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Written emotional disclosure for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Education and follow-up.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2005
    Guideline
  11. Summary of recommendations from the Canadian Asthma Consensus guidelines, 2003.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2005
    Guideline
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S ShahPrimary Health Care Education and Research Unit, Auburn Hospital and Community Health Services, Auburn, NSW 2144, Australia.
J K Peat
E J Mazurski
H Wang
D Sindhusake
C Bruce
R L Henry
P G Gibson
Auburn Hospital · AUChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AUJohn Hunter Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effect of a peer led programme for asthma education on quality of life and related morbidity in adolescents with asthma.

designCluster randomised controlled trial.

settingSix high schools in rural Australia.

participants272 students with recent wheeze, recruited from a cohort of 1515 students from two school years (mean age 12.5 and 15.5 years); 251 (92.3%) completed the study.

interventionA structured education programme for peers comprising three steps (the "Triple A Program").

main outcome measuresQuality of life, school absenteeism, asthma attacks, and lung function.

resultsWhen adjusted for year and sex, mean total quality of life scores showed significant improvement in the intervention than control group. Clinically important improvement in quality of life (>0.5 units) occurred in 25% of students with asthma in the intervention group compared with 12% in the control group (P=0.01). The number needed to treat was 8 (95% confidence interval 4.5 to 35.7). The effect of the intervention was greatest in students in year 10 and in females. Significant improvements occurred in the activities domain (41% v 28%) and in the emotions domain (39% v 19%) in males in the intervention group. School absenteeism significantly decreased in the intervention group only. Asthma attacks at school increased in the control group only.

conclusionThe triple A programme leads to a clinically relevant improvement in quality of life and related morbidity in students with asthma. Wider dissemination of this programme in schools could play an important part in reducing the burden of asthma in adolescents.

Indexed as

Peer GroupAbsenteeismAdolescentAsthmaEmotionsFemaleHumansMalePatient Education as TopicQuality of LifeRespiratory MechanicsSchoolsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID11238152
PMCPMC26550
OpenAlexW1984990222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.