Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11236808›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2001

The pharmacokinetics of levosalbutamol: what are the clinical implications?

D W Boulton, J P Fawcett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Beta2-Agonist Doping Control and Optical Isomer Challenges.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Chiral Switch Drugs for Asthma and Allergies: True Benefit or Marketing Hype.Pediatric allergy, immunology, and pulmonology · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Levalbuterol versus albuterol.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2009
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D W BoultonLaboratory of Drug Disposition and Pharmacogenetics, Institute of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA. boultond@musc.edu
J P Fawcett
Medical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salbutamol (albuterol) is a beta2-adrenoceptor agonist used as a bronchodilator for the treatment of asthma and as a uterine relaxant for the suspension of premature labour. Salbutamol has been marketed as a racemic mixture, although beta2-agonist activity resides almost exclusively in the (R)-enantiomer. The enantioselective disposition of salbutamol and the possibility that (S)-salbutamol has adverse effects have led to the development of an enantiomerically pure (R)-salbutamol formulation known as levosalbutamol (levalbuterol). Salbutamol is metabolised almost exclusively by sulphotransferase (SULT) 1A3 to an inactive metabolite. (R)-Salbutamol is metabolised up to 12 times faster than (S)-salbutamol. This leads to relatively higher plasma concentrations of (S)- salbutamol following all routes of administration, but particularly following oral administration because of extensive metabolism by the intestine. Enantiomer concentrations are similar for the first hour following an inhaled dose, reflecting the fact that salbutamol in the lung probably undergoes little metabolism. Subsequently, (S)-salbutamol predominates due to absorption and metabolism of the swallowed portion of the inhaled dose. Following oral or inhaled administration of enantiomerically pure salbutamol, a small amount (6%) is converted to the other enantiomer, probably by acid-catalysed racemisation in the stomach. Tissue binding of salbutamol is not enantioselective and plasma protein binding is relatively low. Both enantiomers are actively excreted into the urine. Compared with healthy individuals, patients with asthma do not have substantially different pharmacokinetics of the salbutamol enantiomers, but they do appear to have less drug delivered to the lung following inhaled administration because of their narrowed airways. Levosalbutamol elicits an equal or slightly larger response than an equivalent dose of the racemic mixture. This is probably due to competitive inhibition between the enantiomers at beta-adrenoceptors. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for levosalbutamol show relatively large interindividual variations. Functionally significant genetic polymorphisms have been identified for beta2-adrenoceptors, SULT1A3 and organic action transporters, all of which affect the disposition or action of levosalbutamol. Animal, in vitro and some clinical studies have reported deleterious effects of (S)-salbutamol on smooth muscle contractility or lung function. However, well-designed clinical studies in patients with asthma have failed to find evidence of significant toxicity associated with (S)-salbutamol. The clinical consequences of relatively higher plasma concentrations of (S)-salbutamol following administration of racemate remain unclear, but in the absence of clear evidence of toxicity the clinical superiority of levosalbutamol over racemic salbutamol appears to be small.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdministration, OralAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAlbuterolAnimalsArea Under CurveAsthmaHumansMalePolymorphism, GeneticReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2StereoisomerismAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAlbuterolReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2

Identifiers

PMID11236808
OpenAlexW2111769481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.