Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11230173›Full record

ArticleGenome research2001

Generation of a high-density rat EST map.

T E Scheetz, M R Raymond, D Y Nishimura, A McClain, C Roberts, C Birkett, J Gardiner, J Zhang, N Butters, C Sun and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development of a deer mouse whole-genome radiation hybrid panel and comparative mapping of Mus chromosome 11 loci.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2006
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

T E ScheetzHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
M R Raymond
D Y Nishimura
A McClain
C Roberts
C Birkett
J Gardiner
J Zhang
N Butters
C Sun
A Kwitek-Black
H Jacob
T L Casavant
M B Soares
V C Sheffield
University of Iowa · US

Funding

PROGRAM FOR RAT GENE DISCOVERY AND MAPPINGR01HL059789 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SHEFFIELD, VAL C · 1997 to 2001
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS 2R01HL59789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a high-density EST map of the rat, consisting of >11,000 ESTs. These ESTs were placed on a radiation hybrid framework map of genetic markers spanning all 20 rat autosomes, plus the X chromosome. The framework maps have a total size of approximately 12,400 cR, giving an average correspondence of 240 kb/cR. The frameworks are all LOD 3 chromosomal maps consisting of 775 radiation-hybrid-mapped genetic markers and ESTs. To date, we have generated radiation-hybrid-mapping data for >14,000 novel ESTs identified by our Rat Gene Discovery and Mapping Project (http://ratEST.uiowa.edu), from which we have placed >11,000 on our framework maps. To minimize mapping errors, ESTs were mapped in duplicate and consensus RH vectors produced for use in the placement procedure. This EST map was then used to construct high-density comparative maps between rat and human and rat and mouse. These maps will be a useful resource for positional cloning of genes for rat models of human diseases and in the creation and verification of a tiling set of map order for the upcoming rat-genome sequencing.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsAnimalsGene ExpressionRadiation Hybrid MappingRats

Identifiers

PMID11230173
PMCPMC311028
OpenAlexW2134562734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.