ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001
Using clinical evidence.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Funding Source on "Spin" in Studies of Ocriplasmin Therapy for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Recent Initiatives in the Republic of Srpska to Enhance Appropriate Use of Antibiotics in Ambulatory Care; Their Influence and Implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- Different initiatives across Europe to enhance losartan utilization post generics: impact and implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2014Article
- The process and costs of publishing medical journals in Sri Lanka: an economic evaluation.BMJ open · 2011Article
- Policies to enhance prescribing efficiency in europe: findings and future implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2010Article
- Effectiveness of strategies to encourage general practitioners to accept an offer of free access to online evidence-based information: a randomised controlled trial.Implementation science : IS · 2009Article
- Potential bias in ophthalmic pharmaceutical clinical trials.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2008Article
- Best paediatric evidence; is it accessible and used on-call?Archives of disease in childhood · 2004Article
- Evidence-based medicine and psychiatric practice.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2003Article
- BMJ journals free to the developing world.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Article
- Using clinical evidence. Randomised controlled trials are not the only evidence.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
- Britain's gift: a "Medline" of synthesised evidence.BMJ (Clinical research ed.)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.