Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11226302›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2001

Mechanisms underlying losses of heterozygosity in human colorectal cancers.

S Thiagalingam, S Laken, J K Willson, S D Markowitz, K W Kinzler, B Vogelstein, C Lengauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in pMMR/MSS Colorectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Multilocus Inherited Neoplasia Allele Syndrome (MINAS): an update.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Targeting loss of heterozygosity for cancer-specific immunotherapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S ThiagalingamOncology Center, Program in Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
S Laken
J K Willson
S D Markowitz
K W Kinzler
B Vogelstein
C Lengauer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Losses of heterozygosity are the most common molecular genetic alteration observed in human cancers. However, there have been few systematic studies to understand the mechanism(s) responsible for losses of heterozygosity in such tumors. Here we report a detailed investigation of the five chromosomes lost most frequently in human colorectal cancers. A total of 10,216 determinations were made with 88 microsatellite markers, revealing 245 chromosomal loss events. The mechanisms of loss were remarkably chromosome-specific. Some chromosomes displayed complete loss such as that predicted to result from mitotic nondisjunction. However, more than half of the losses were associated with losses of only part of a chromosome rather than a whole chromosome. Surprisingly, these losses were due largely to structural alterations rather than to mitotic recombination, break-induced replication, or gene conversion, suggesting novel mechanisms for the generation of much of the aneuploidy in this common tumor type.

Indexed as

Loss of HeterozygosityAllelesChromosome DeletionColorectal NeoplasmsHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceTumor Cells, Cultured

Identifiers

PMID11226302
PMCPMC30201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.